December 30, 2011

Finally, some bipartisanship ? oops, nevermind (AP)

Filed under: induce — Tags: , , — @ 4:47 am

WASHINGTON ? Sen. Mitch McConnell does not high-five easily or often. But a deal to keep American workers’ taxes from rising on Jan. 1 was reason enough for the coolest negotiator in the Senate to lift a hand on camera and slap ? or pat ? some skin.

His celebration was premature.

Furious House Republicans said McConnell’s deal for a two-month extension of payroll tax cuts is 10 months too few. They are prepared to let everyone’s Social Security taxes rise an average $20 a week for a while if that’s what it takes to extend the cut for a year. And they are intent on dragging the vacationing Senate back to Washington to do it their way.

“I don’t care about the political implications,” Rep. Tom Reed, R-N.Y., said Monday.

Senate Republicans do, especially those up for re-election at a time when Americans are more apt to trust car salesmen than Congress.

“The House Republicans’ plan to scuttle the deal to help middle-class families is irresponsible and wrong,” said one, Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass.

It was at least the third time in a year dominated by partisan standoffs that House conservatives, led by a nearly 90-member freshman class, brought GOP leaders up short on their plans to compromise. The first was last spring when they forced GOP leaders to rewrite spending bills to deepen federal spending cuts. Then there were objections in the summer over raising the nation’s debt limit, which brought the government to the brink of a first-ever default.

Now, the question of compromise is keeping a tax cut ? the stuff of Republican dogma ? hanging on the eve of the presidential and congressional election year.

At stake are Social Security payroll taxes paid by 160 million workers. President Barack Obama and the last Congress agreed to cut them by 2 percentage points a year ago, but only for a year. On Jan. 1, they go back up to 6.2 percent if Congress doesn’t act. Also, people without jobs for more than six months start losing benefits and doctors’ Medicare fees get cut by 27 percent.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, derided what he said was yet another instance of the Senate “kicking the can down the road” with only a two-month renewal of the status quo. Doing it for an entire year would mean more certainty “for job creators and others,” he said.

House Republicans huddled late into the night and planned to instead call Tuesday for formal negotiations with the Senate, rejecting the two-month version.

The dustup marked an unusual disconnect between Boehner and McConnell. Even before the 2010 elections made Boehner speaker, he and McConnell coordinated closely on tactics. This year, they’ve stayed in close contact, either by phone or by shuttling quietly between their office suites at the Capitol, their aides say.

Kentucky’s McConnell is no shrinking violet when it comes to partisan brinksmanship.

He’s vowed, for example, to use his perch as the Senate’s top Republican to deny Obama a second term. He considers cartoons mocking his hardcore negotiating style badges of honor, and posts them on his office wall. But even McConnell spoke up Saturday in favor of compromise on the payroll tax, lest another standoff drop Congress’ approval ratings the few points they have left to fall.

“In order to achieve something around here, we have to compromise,” he intoned just before the Senate’s vote Saturday on the two-month tax cut extension. “That is, in fact, what we have done. We have crafted a bill not designed to fail but designed to pass.”

It passed overwhelmingly, 89-10, and senators immediately bolted for a month-long recess, a year of sniping and ugliness finished at last ? or so they thought.

House Republicans immediately balked and insisted on their one-year version, six times more expensive and paid for in part by raising Medicare premiums for people whose incomes exceed $80,000 a year. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid made clear he had no intention of calling the Senate back into session to vote on that or any other bill.

Fine, the House freshmen said. A two-month deal, they suggested, was not worth having because it did not afford business owners and others enough time to plan. They were outraged at the Senate ? including 39 of its 47 Republicans ? for voting for a two-month extension.

“The Senate just needs to do its job,” said Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle, R-N.Y. “What they sent us over was an insult to the American people.”

“That vote (in the Senate) had a lot more to do with getting out of Washington and going back home and spending time with our loved ones,” said Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark.

So it’s all or nothing? House Republicans are prepared to let taxes rise on Jan. 1?

“We didn’t say it’s all or nothing,” Womack said.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111220/ap_on_go_co/us_congress_dysfunction_junction

star escher tenacious d tony hawk jill scott brooke shields the tempest

December 13, 2011

Congress At Impasse Over Must-Pass Measures

Enlarge J. Scott Applewhite/AP House Speaker John Boehner speaks to reporters at the Capitol on Monday.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP House Speaker John Boehner speaks to reporters at the Capitol on Monday.

Congress is supposed to head home for the holidays at the end of this week, but there’s a whole lot of work to do before then. And for now at least, the parties remain divided over a number of other must-pass measures. This is the part of the tango of Congress where the Republican House offers a plan. “The House is going to do its job, and it’s time for the Senate then to do its job,” said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, at a press conference Monday. Then, as if on cue, the Democratic Senate balked. This was, of course, preceded by the part of the dance where the Democratic Senate offered and failed to pass its own version, because it couldn’t overcome a Republican filibuster.   “Every hour they delay and every day they filibuster is one more the Senate by necessity will have to stay in Washington to get its work done,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., on the floor. On the line are extended unemployment benefits for millions who have been out of work more than six months, and a payroll tax holiday that if it isn’t extended would mean $1,000 less in take-home pay next year for the average family. Before the end of the year, Congress also has to act on the so-called doc fix, otherwise Medicare reimbursements for doctors would drop drastically. And there are numerous tax fixes that add up to billions of dollars. It’s a lot. But Boehner said Monday the House will vote on a bill that takes care of all these things and more. “I do believe it’s going to pass with bipartisan support and when it comes to jobs, the American people can’t wait, so we’re going to take action,” he said. But even if he’s right about bipartisan support in the House, the path to passage in the Senate is virtually nonexistent. That’s because the House bill contains a number of provisions a majority of Democrats don’t support: The bill would significantly cut back benefits for the long-term unemployed. And most notably it would force the Obama administration to act within 60 days on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

I do believe it’s going to pass with bipartisan support and when it comes to jobs, the American people can’t wait, so we’re going to take action.

– House Speaker John Boehner

“The American people want jobs,” Boehner said. “This is as close to a shovel ready project as you’re ever going to see.” The pipeline would bring oil from Canada to refineries in the South. Republicans call it a job creator. Democrats are worried about possible environmental impacts. The Obama administration says it needs until 2013 to make a decision. This is a fight that’s been raging for some time and is now attached to the end-of-year must-pass legislative discussions. “It’s time to stop the posturing,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. “Here’s a bill that contains top priorities from both sides. Let’s take it up and pass it without any more theatrics.” If the past is any guide, the theatrics this week are only getting started. Democrats are still insisting that the payroll tax holiday be paid for with a surtax on income over $1 million a year. “Should we ask the wealthiest in America to pay a little more in taxes so that we can provide a payroll tax cut for almost 160 million Americans?” asked Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Il., the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate. “What we hear from the other side of the aisle over and over again is ‘no.’” In fact, they’ve heard it in the form of failed bills twice in the past two weeks. The thing Democrats really want is the thing Republicans hate. And the thing Republicans want is the thing Democrats are against. And yet, somehow between now and Christmas, most political watchers believe the partisan differences will quietly be worked out. Members of Congress will make it home for the holidays with plenty of presents for their constituents in the form of a payroll tax holiday, extended unemployment benefits and a whole sleigh full of other end of year fixes.

Congress At Impasse Over Must-Pass Measures